James Farganne

Fukushima Contamination Hype: Facts, or “Fear Porn”?

January 13, 2014 – Farganne

Fukushima-Contamination-Pacific-Ocean-450x253

Introduction

Fear about Fukushima and its “poisoning of the Pacific” is rampant these days. On Facebook, I have noticed that the hysteria amongst my “truther” friends has grown to such a pitch that they get angry if I dare to question the reality of radioactive tuna, disintegrating starfish, and a nuclear apocalypse looming over the Pacific Northwest. The term “fear porn” has gained a lot of traction, and in this instance I can see why: intelligent people have become so addicted to their Pacific Ocean horror fixation, they refuse to evaluate any data that might contradict it.

Are there dying animal populations? Should residents of the Pacific Northwest be concerned? Does the Pacific Ocean contain large amounts of radioactive material? While the answer to all these questions is a definitive “Yes”, there is, as usual, a lot more to know.

Mainstream media outlets predictably peddle the lie that all four obliterated reactor containments at Fukushima remain unbreached. Meanwhile, the so-called “alternative media” has been hammering truth seekers relentlessly with dire claims that are equally misleading. These two false scenarios – one, everything is under control, and two, the Pacific Ocean has been destroyed – constitute the usual goalposts by which people are routinely deceived, manipulated, and distracted from reality.

Usually, the goalpost dialectic leads the public down a predetermined path of brainwashed opinion, and reality is somewhere outside the confines of the posts. In this case, however, reality is not only outside the goalposts, but in between them as well.

Let’s look at the latter reality first.

Animal Die-Offs

Yes, there was a starfish apocalypse. Dead starfish by the millions littered the ocean floor off the British Columbian coast. Their arms were falling off. Their guts were gooshing out. When marine biologists collected them in tanks for analysis, they sometimes turned to jelly before they reached the laboratory. This starfish die-off is confirmed by multiple sources; it is in no way a hoax.

“Alternative news” sites such as ENEnews.com promptly attributed the die-off to radiation from Fukushima. Droves of truthers, already terrified by reports of radioactive tuna and Google Maps images showing the killer radiation overtaking the Pacific like a psychedelic oil slick, fell for this bit of disinformation hook, line, and sinker.

The truth is that such die-offs are a regular occurrence in nature, as any professional biologist knows. Die-offs happen when populations outstrip food supply; malnourishment leads to starvation and, more importantly, disease, which quickly propagates, effecting a population crash.

After the crash, the survivors, presumably the fittest, enjoy less competition for a rebounding food supply, and there is a population explosion.

Dr. Craig McClain, Assistant Director of Science for the National Evolutionary Synthesis Center, identifies the syndrome that caused the die-off, and gives three reasons why it had nothing to do with Fukushima: (1) as an observed phenomenon, it predates Fukushima by 3 – 15 years; (2) it also occurs on the East Coast; and (3), other forms of life in the region remained unaffected.

Far from being unusual events, animal die-offs happen all the time, and normally go unremarked by all but the scientists who monitor them. Unscrupulous outlets like ENEnews.com and Rense.com are now hauling reports of them into the alternative media limelight and attributing them to Fukushima fallout without presenting a shred of evidence. In doing so, they spread not only disinformation, but needless fear.

Atmospheric Fallout

I have noticed many claims of high Geiger counter readings in the Pacific Northwest. As I live a few hundred kilometers upwind of Fukushima (west of it), I have no way to verify these claims personally, so my inclination is to suspend judgment until I have more data to work with. From there, I employ my BS detector, which is calibrated to my satisfaction.

According to Jim Stone, the engineer and ex-NSA analyst who proved that Fukushima was an act of environmental terrorism, the outlook for the North American Pacific coast is troubling. Not dire, but there are causes for concern. The nuke that destroyed Reactor 3 and blew its fuel core sky-high did indeed produce particles that were blown eastward and are most likely to end up in riverbeds. Stone says that if he were to go camping anywhere in that region without a Geiger counter, he would avoid dry riverbeds by default.

So, radioactive particles that are not naturally occurring – suddenly they occur. That isn’t good, but neither is it the end of the world, when one considers the many nuclear test detonations conducted by the Cold War superpowers and other “first-world” nations. True, such explosions are not as dirty as the one at Reactor 3, but they certainly don’t vanish without a trace. Said test detonations have been identified as one factor in the cancer rate explosion of the 20th century.

Then there are articles like this one from Geigercounter.com, which argues that high readings in California were owing to naturally radioactive sand. I’m not saying it discounts all other claims of high readings, but it does make me reflect on the possibility that (1) more people than ever, out of fear, are buying Geiger counters and taking readings, and (2) they assume that any reading above normal is directly due to Fukushima.

What most people don’t realize is background radiation is not uniform. There are naturally occurring hot spots that vary widely in intensity. In some parts of Iran, people thrive in regions where the radioactive norm is many times that in the United States.

So I think it makes sense to take the amateur Geiger counter readings with several grains of salt.

Stone makes another good point. In Washington State, police cars are equipped with Geiger counters, and they still sometimes detect radiotherapy patients and pull them over. This indicates that the background radiation in that region has not spiked because of Fukushima; otherwise, the cops’ Geiger counters would be jammed and useless for detecting cancer patients.

Bottom line: some particles from the obliterated core of Reactor 3 have certainly found their way to North America, but the reality does not begin to approach all the hype.

“The Pacific Ocean is DYING!”

This is where my friends have been getting most emotional, most reactionary, and understandably so. People love whales and dolphins, and a whole lot of them enjoy seafood too. If the Pacific dies, well, how much more catastrophic can you get, short of a planetary mass extinction event?

It turns out that this claim, that “The Pacific Ocean is dying”, is the most tenuous of them all.

For this section, I am going to appeal to what I consider to be a qualified authority, and let Jim Stone speak for himself:

The Pacific is not destroyed for several reasons. One of them is the fact that for millions of years almost all of the reactor cores will sit where they are right now, that material is not all getting put in the ocean – in fact, only a fraction of a percent will ever be there (short of what reactor 3 put there during the blast, which was a lot).

Another reason why the Pacific will not be destroyed is the fact that it is just too much volume to contaminate seriously with only three reactor cores. The U.S. did a large number of atomic tests out in the Pacific, many of them using up to a thousand pounds of enriched uranium and it did not wreck the ocean. I would estimate that at a minimum the U.S. blew up a total of at least 20 percent of the total volume of radioactive material in the melted down reactors during past atomic tests out in the Pacific, and it cannot be measured now. And Tsar Bomba which was lit off by Russia contained approximately 5 percent of the radiological potential of the reactors out at Fuku and released it all into the environment in one big blast. The area is not dead now (though it was significantly fried at the time).

The ocean happens to be an ideal sink for radioactive waste. One key factor is that even gamma radiation cannot penetrate more than two and a half feet of seawater. Water itself is a radiation shield. This will serve to enormously squelch any damage Fukushima does to the ocean and certainly people living on the coast will not get anything measurable from the sea even while swimming in it. If it was open air, where gamma rays can travel miles, well, that might be a different story.

It takes only a fuel pool with a little water to soak up ALL the radiation from many reactor cores. To say even reactor 3´s entire expelled core could poison the ocean is beyond stupid – it’s ludicrous. Three hundred tons of radiactive water may weigh a lot in the bedroom, but compared to the ocean it is not even a bird turd dropping in the Panama Canal. When you also factor in the fact that this water will have less than a milligram of dissolved nuclear material, it’s ludicrous to say that whatever is seeping into the ocean from Fuku could cause a problem. Any contamination being read happened when the dust of reactor 3 precipitated into the ocean, NOT what is seeping in now. The big dirty already happened . . . .

Again, when I asked him if he was avoiding tuna, his reply:

Why would I avoid tuna? The Fuku scare is BULLSHIT. That’s like avoiding tuna because nuclear tests were done in the ocean 50 years ago. True, reactor 3 matches that but to think the entire ocean is shot is ridiculous…

Of course I eat tuna. If tuna was even marginally radioactive, if it had even a trace of radioactivity all the port alarms would go off every time a fishing boat came to town. Those boats are made out of steel, not lead and things remain awful silent in Ketchican.

I’m no scientist, but Stone’s claims make sense to me. I checked it out, and water is indeed an excellent radiation sink. The Pacific tests really happened – ask the natives of Bikini Atoll. The analogy of the bird turd in the Panama Canal also seems about right when you consider that the Pacific Ocean occupies fully 30% of the planet’s surface.

Conclusion

I know that I have not addressed all the Fukushima contamination claims, just the main ones. If you are freaked out by the hype, I suggest that you consider the possibility that you are getting roped in by a fear porn campaign designed to … do what?

Now we come to the reality outside the goalposts.

Stone thinks that the purpose of the disinformation is to divert truthers’ attention from the real issues surrounding Fukushima. Those are that (1) the disaster on 3/11/11 was a coordinated attack on Japan, (2) the majority of environmental damage outside Japan came in the immediate wake of that attack, and (3) the most serious issue is all the expelled fuel that remains lying out in the open near Reactor 3’s destroyed containment. So lethal is that debris that not even robots can survive proximity to it, and it threatens to render much of that region of Japan uninhabitable for centuries to come.

I think there is another purpose to it, as well. I think the “elites” enjoy scaring the masses, and in a sense they feed on it. Fear is an excellent tool for keeping people’s minds in chains, especially when they happen to be a demographic (frequenters of “alternative” media) who are consciously trying to shake off those chains and become mentally free.

If you haven’t yet read Stone’s report proving that 3/11/11 was an act of war and Israel was involved, you can download it in PDF format here.

jimstonefreelance.com

farganne.wordpress.com

Fukushima – What Really Happened

February 1, 2012 – James Farganne

Recently, I posted a short overview of Jim Stone’s Fukushima report, which concluded that the 9.0-magnitude quake was a lie concocted to conceal the real cause of the tsunami: a seabed nuke.

Stone’s report proves definitively that the official story of 3/11, like that of 9/11, is a poorly woven fabric of lies and inconsistencies.

Drone photos show that the containment walls of Reactors 1, 3, and 4 were obliterated. Concrete walls 4 – 8 feet thick were blown to dust, leaving only skeletal rebar. Hydrogen, at such low pressure, could never have wrought such massive destruction. It would defy laws of physics, as well as historical precedent.

The destruction of Reactor 4’s containment walls was a clear case of sabotage. It had no fuel in it, so it was not operating. Yet it blew sky high. Reactor 3 vanished completely, core and all, after exploding into a mushroom cloud.

Claims by Arnie Gundersen that the explosions resulted from “prompt criticality” don’t wash. Reactor core meltdowns do not produce mushroom clouds. Nuclear weapons do that. Moreover, Gundersen, “expert” mouthpiece for the MSM and alternative media outlets, has been outed by real professionals in his field as a fraud.

The foregoing facts are clear enough to the untrained eye. More subtle are signs of sabotage within the power plants’ control systems. Seeing these takes more brainpower. You need to visualize the unfamiliar. You have to find out what switch gear is. There’s a dry official report to hump through, diagrams at which to squint. You have to scroll toward the bottom of Stone’s report for this section. It has no proper title. Just keep your eyes peeled for the first sentence:

“Fukushima was impossible.”

This section was the kernel of Stone’s investigation. It is a crystalline lattice of logic and evidence that obliterates the official story of the reactors’ destruction as completely as the reactors were themselves destroyed.

WHAT REALLY HAPPENED?

According to officialdom, the reactors exploded because the cores overheated. The emergency cooling systems failed because the backup generators were flooded by the tsunami.

All of this is bogus. First, a careful reading of an official report from the World Nuclear Association reveals that the tsunami did not flood the generators. There was another cause for their malfunction.

Second, three of the nine cooling systems needed no electricity. They used steam power from the reactor cores. They were the real emergency systems. Swamped generators would therefore have been irrelevant.

Third, these three passive systems kicked in at Reactors 1 and 3.  Then the valves that fed them steam were shut. This required a command. It was a deliberate act.

Who, or what, shut those valves?

The most likely answer points to Dimona, Israel’s “nuclear research” center.

ENTER STUXNET

Israeli security firm Magna BSP landed a security contract at Fukushima Daiichi shortly after Japan offered to enrich uranium for Iran. Soon after Magna BSP arrived, cybersecurity giant Symantec reported that the Stuxnet virus had infiltrated thousands of computers in Japan.

This is significant because Stuxnet is an Israeli invention.  Magna BSP, an Israeli firm, had no previous history outside of contracts with Dimona, where the Stuxnet virus was born.

Stuxnet works by disrupting industrial hydraulics, the pipes and valves that drove Fukushima’s cooling systems. Stuxnet runs amok while sending normal readings to the engineers at their control stations. Israel is documented to have used this virus to damage centrifuges at a nuclear facility in Iran.

The cooling systems at Fukushima were controlled by Siemens software, which the Stuxnet virus was designed specifically to attack.

Stuxnet can be administrated via the kind of data link that Magna BSP installed before scramming back to Israel just prior to the disaster.

As a hypothesis, Stuxnet explains why the generators failed. It explains how the valves in the passive cooling systems got shut. It explains why engineers are still getting containment pressure readings from Reactor 3, even though the containment is no longer there, and it explains a lot of other things as well.

If you want to debunk the Stuxnet hypothesis, you’re going to have your work cut out for you. If Stuxnet was a duck, then everything about what happened at Fukushima would be quacking like one.

CONCLUSION

On 3/11/11, Reactors 1, 2, 3, and 4 were utterly destroyed, with 1, 3, and 4 suspiciously exploding.

Though Stone only got direct evidence of a nuke planted at Reactor 3, which produced the mushroom cloud, it is rational to believe Reactors 1 and 4 also had them, with 4 exploding even though it had no fuel core installed at the time.

The lesser magnitude of the explosions at Reactors 1 and 4 can be attributed to the fact that gun-type nukes are not consistent in their yield. Reactor 3’s detonation might also have gotten a boost from the pressure released in a reactor pressure vessel breach — a sensible conclusion in that the reactor is completely gone. Stuxnet appears to have affected all of the reactors’ control systems, crippling generators and shutting valves. Problems at Reactor 2 appear to be Stuxnet-related only. All four were fatalities.

But of course, don’t take my word for it. Go and study the report for yourself.

Our First Article on Stone’s Report prompted this Hit Piece in the MSM, Wired.com

[Editor’s note: Wired starts their article based on the WRONG/FALSE/FAKE/FABLED fact that there was a 9.o earthquake instead of a 6.67 maximum magnitude, this should tell you how well-informed they are at Wired. But then again what else can you expect from a mainstream mouthpiece?]